Posted by Twelvebit (Victoria, United States) on 29 September 2007 in People & Portraits.
This is sort of not an image of an image that got away. I snapped it a few steps after what would have been a much better image that showed a cloud of smoke coming from the guy on the right. I also had just let things go in automatic and hadn't been paying attention to my camera settings: hence, my shutter speed was too low to produce the image I intended. Still, I like the look of this couple. I saw no one else dressed this way downtown on this hot summer day. The guy asked me if they were going to be famous --ah, but it were so.
VFXY Photos | Cool Photoblogs | Listed on Photoblogs.org
Its quite a neat shot, I like the fluidity and slight motion evident as they walk - well they kind of look like they swagger, full of confidence and carefree.
29 Sep 2007 4:09pm
@Richard_Irwin: Thank you. They were definitely confident and comfortable --a nice feat wearing black jackets in the very hot and humid weather that afternoon. And not confrontational about having their photograph taken.
LOL good shot! Looks like they were off to an important mtg.!! Or maybe they are secret agents?
29 Sep 2007 4:15pm
@Lost Valley View: To or from a meeting --it was in the middle of the afternoon, so probably. I was thinking maybe part of the Men-In-Black team, fresh from an encounter with space aliens.
"The guy asked me if they were going to be famous"
This is the reason you never see people's images on my site. I have phobia of taking those shots as it feels violating people's rights. I always consider photographers who take those shots very brave.
Beside it's slow shutter speed and little camera shake, this image is awesome and well taken.
29 Sep 2007 6:28pm
@Amir: Well, the law is on our side. There is no right not to be photographed in public, as the burgeoning use of surveillance cameras attests to. The whole notion of "privacy," as Alberto Gonzalez might say, is becoming "quaint." Still, I agree, there are other considerations.
My approach to taking photos of people varies, depending on the circumstances. Though, legally, permission isn't required, one thing I never do is take photos of children in public without permission from their parents (maybe a long shot of a group, but not individual children). I don't like to photograph people responding to the camera so I prefer not to ask permission when I take photos of adults, but sometimes I do. And I don't take photos of people when I feel such photos are exploitive. For instance, I saw any number of "homeless" people in Houston but I didn't take their photos because in the particular circumstances it didn't feel right. This isn't to say I wouldn't take such photos if I had their permission and they understood how the photos were to be used, or in some other particular circumstances.
On the whole, it's been a long time since I've been challenged for taking someone's photo in public, and back then, I wasn't so careful. I have professional looking equipment, I act like what I'm doing is legitimate and I take photos openly, so most people apparently assume I'm taking photos for some "professional" purpose. Most people seem to be flattered by the idea that their photo may be published somewhere. It hasn't come up, but I carry business cards to provide my bona fides and to hand out to people who might want to find their photos on the internet.
In the last couple years I've been challenged for taking photos numerous times, but it has always been for taking a photo of something, not someone. Of course, like I said, I'm careful about who I take photos of.
good attempt 12bit the slight blur motion suits it well wow you must have been standing quite a distance away since your lens was at 202mm! maybe a 400mm might help :) but then it'll costs tons btw the D300 is out :)
30 Sep 2007 4:25am
@kairospix: I saw them coming from a distance and took a position to take a photo or two. Of course, they were coming right at me and walked right by me. I have a cheap 300mm lens, but don't use it walking around the city because it's slow and it only opens up to 70 mm --not much good for closed in spaces.
I've been considering a D200, and it looks like the D300 isn't that much more expensive, so it's definitely a purchase I'm thinking about. B&H Photo has the D300 with the 18-200 VR lens for about $2500, with the body running about $1800.
PREVIEW ONLY
Add your comment ...
NIKON D804/100 secondF/5.6ISO 100202 mm
blackhoustondowntowncoolsuits